Avvo Sued by Another Sanctioned Lawyer
August 31st, 2010 by Mark Britton, CEOLet’s face it: Lawyers don’t love us if they have a history of behaving badly. We knew this would be the case when we launched Avvo, and it is still the case today. Not surprisingly, these lawyers (in legal parlance, “sanctioned lawyers”) fear the transparency that Avvo offers and they attempt to snuff it. Now, usually they just threaten to take us to court. However, every now and then they actually sue.
Yep, that’s right . . . another sanctioned lawyer has sued Avvo. When I say “another,” you may recall that nine days after we launched Avvo (yes nine days) a sanctioned lawyer named John Henry Browne sued us for, in his view, misleading Washington consumers. Interestingly, he asked for damages for himself rather than the aggrieved consumers, but that’s another story. Fortunately, a federal judge saw Mr. Browne’s complaint for what it was and threw it out on a Motion to Dismiss.
Our current plaintiff, Joe Davis has filed a similarly misguided complaint. It is a 25-page manifesto presumably intended to bully Avvo (you can see it here). Sadly, not a word of it speaks to the real issue: that Mr. Davis was sanctioned by the Florida State Bar in 2007 and he doesn’t want you to know about it. And I get it — Mr. Davis has had some serious problems involving child support payments and failing to appear for court dates – so much so that he was twice convicted and spent eight days in the pokey (you can read more about it here). He was also found to have willfully obstructed the Florida Bar’s disciplinary process relating to these matters. I wouldn’t want people to know about these things either.
But that is not how the modern informational age works. Thanks in large part to the informational behemoths like Google and Microsoft, all sorts of information that was once locked away is being digitized and democratized for consumers. What once may have taken a trip to the courthouse or a public information request is now a simple Google search away. Those that have something to hide hate this. Those that don’t range from ecstatic to indifferent.
But here’s the kicker: Wherever you fall on this spectrum is irrelevant, because it’s not about you. It’s about those consumers who are buying your products and services. They have a right to know the good and the bad, and increasingly they demand to see it. Sites like Yelp, Zillow, TripAdvisor and Avvo have not prospered simply out of the ether. They have prospered because they give consumers more information and better guidance than they have ever had access to before. In specific regard to Davis v. Avvo, while consumers have a right to know all of the highlights of Mr. Davis’ resume (which he dutifully shares here), they also have a right to know of his misconduct.
As I have said many times before, we are shining a flashlight in dark places. Not surprisingly, some are more comfortable in the dark.
Avvo issued a press release regarding this lawsuit today. You can find it here: “Avvo Sued By Another Sanctioned Lawyer .” Thanks to everyone who has already offered their support. We look forward to a speedy resolution to this deceptive lawsuit and all of the silliness it brings.
[Note: Updated at 9:01 a.m. 8/31/10 based on comment below]




















