<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Legal Blogging Platforms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/</link>
	<description>Find a Lawyer.  Free Legal Advice.  Lawyer Ratings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rankings</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-219017</link>
		<dc:creator>rankings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-219017</guid>
		<description>So a quick question for all: what are some of the plug-in examples specific to legal profession blogs that are most common and easily used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a quick question for all: what are some of the plug-in examples specific to legal profession blogs that are most common and easily used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet PR</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-55717</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-55717</guid>
		<description>Wordpress is the best platform for any type of blogging platform for applications like legal, medical and others because of its huge numbers of plugins, themes and community support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress is the best platform for any type of blogging platform for applications like legal, medical and others because of its huge numbers of plugins, themes and community support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Surfarp</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-49734</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Surfarp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-49734</guid>
		<description>So a quick question for all:  what are some of the plug-in examples specific to legal profession blogs that are most common and easily used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a quick question for all:  what are some of the plug-in examples specific to legal profession blogs that are most common and easily used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legal Blog Software Showdown &#171; Web Strategy Directory</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-48940</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal Blog Software Showdown &#171; Web Strategy Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-48940</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog Software Showdown    Avvo&#8217;s Marketing Manager Conrad Saam recently produced a feature comparison table for the various legal blogging platforms. Unfortunately, the list included a number of inaccuracies, prompting responses from Kevin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog Software Showdown    Avvo&#8217;s Marketing Manager Conrad Saam recently produced a feature comparison table for the various legal blogging platforms. Unfortunately, the list included a number of inaccuracies, prompting responses from Kevin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Firm Web Strategy : Legal Blog Software Showdown</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-48813</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Firm Web Strategy : Legal Blog Software Showdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-48813</guid>
		<description>[...] Marketing Manager Conrad Saam recently produced a feature comparison table for the various legal blogging platforms. Unfortunately, the list included a number of inaccuracies, prompting responses from Kevin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing Manager Conrad Saam recently produced a feature comparison table for the various legal blogging platforms. Unfortunately, the list included a number of inaccuracies, prompting responses from Kevin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Smith</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-48298</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-48298</guid>
		<description>Avvo being &quot;Most widely used&quot; is clearly misleading.  Avvo should had an * indicating that self-hosted Wordpress is most widely used, not Avvo blogs.  Then you can explain that Avvo uses Wordpress to build its blogs.  People don&#039;t have to pay $300.00 to use Wordpress.  They can use it on their own, which is why you are trying to blur the lines.  I hate shady marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avvo being &#8220;Most widely used&#8221; is clearly misleading.  Avvo should had an * indicating that self-hosted WordPress is most widely used, not Avvo blogs.  Then you can explain that Avvo uses WordPress to build its blogs.  People don&#8217;t have to pay $300.00 to use WordPress.  They can use it on their own, which is why you are trying to blur the lines.  I hate shady marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Jaar</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-48296</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Jaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-48296</guid>
		<description>Rex,

I totally agree with you about Wordpress! If there was any objective analysis provided and it was open for votes to readers, I am convinced Wordpress would easily win! However, for beginners, I think Blogger is the easiest to use.

I would also add that, knowing what Kevin does, even if these were his prices, it is pocket change compared to the bang you&#039;ll get for bucks! I have yet to see what Avvo will do for lawyers. Is there a free trial period available? If so, I am willing to try and comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex,</p>
<p>I totally agree with you about WordPress! If there was any objective analysis provided and it was open for votes to readers, I am convinced WordPress would easily win! However, for beginners, I think Blogger is the easiest to use.</p>
<p>I would also add that, knowing what Kevin does, even if these were his prices, it is pocket change compared to the bang you&#8217;ll get for bucks! I have yet to see what Avvo will do for lawyers. Is there a free trial period available? If so, I am willing to try and comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Fruchter</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-48290</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Fruchter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-48290</guid>
		<description>@Doug Cornelius - a review of the Avvo Legal Blog site indicates they are using Word Press as their platform. So that option is represented in the first column (and explains why the chart says the Avvo option runs on a &quot;widely used platform&quot;).

But my understanding is that LexBlog also runs on a widely used platform - SixApart&#039;s Moveable Type - it&#039;s just LexBlog customizes the platform for its clients. That seems to be exactly what Avvo will be doing for its clients with Word Press. No difference there, as I see it.

But I think the comparison to LexBlog is still apples-to-oranges. For $25/month, it sounds like Avvo is offering a service more akin to setting up a client on, say, Typepad, and then letting the client run their own show after the blog goes live (but presumably with tech support to address any bugs or errors that might arise). But I don&#039;t expect clients would get nearly the same level of ongoing tactical support and strategic guidance as they would from a company like LexBlog (which, as I see it, is offering more of an &quot;agency&quot; model - the kind of model, incidentally, that eLawMarketing also offers).

So it really depends on whether a lawyer is comfortable with more of a self-service model (which Avvo seems to be), or is interested in the value-add of ongoing strategic and tactical support and guidance from an agency like LexBlog or eLawMarketing. For those interested in the latter, it&#039;s natural that the option will cost more - in most cases in life, you get what you pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Doug Cornelius &#8211; a review of the Avvo Legal Blog site indicates they are using Word Press as their platform. So that option is represented in the first column (and explains why the chart says the Avvo option runs on a &#8220;widely used platform&#8221;).</p>
<p>But my understanding is that LexBlog also runs on a widely used platform &#8211; SixApart&#8217;s Moveable Type &#8211; it&#8217;s just LexBlog customizes the platform for its clients. That seems to be exactly what Avvo will be doing for its clients with Word Press. No difference there, as I see it.</p>
<p>But I think the comparison to LexBlog is still apples-to-oranges. For $25/month, it sounds like Avvo is offering a service more akin to setting up a client on, say, Typepad, and then letting the client run their own show after the blog goes live (but presumably with tech support to address any bugs or errors that might arise). But I don&#8217;t expect clients would get nearly the same level of ongoing tactical support and strategic guidance as they would from a company like LexBlog (which, as I see it, is offering more of an &#8220;agency&#8221; model &#8211; the kind of model, incidentally, that eLawMarketing also offers).</p>
<p>So it really depends on whether a lawyer is comfortable with more of a self-service model (which Avvo seems to be), or is interested in the value-add of ongoing strategic and tactical support and guidance from an agency like LexBlog or eLawMarketing. For those interested in the latter, it&#8217;s natural that the option will cost more &#8211; in most cases in life, you get what you pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Myles</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-48276</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Myles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-48276</guid>
		<description>I am a huge fan of Blogger and I think that you Blogger column is completely misrepresented, and as Doug suggested self-hosted wordpress is also missing.

Of course everyone is entitled to a little marketing spin now and again, but misrepresenting the facts will get you more than a little lash back from the users who know and love their blogging platforms (as you have now discovered).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge fan of Blogger and I think that you Blogger column is completely misrepresented, and as Doug suggested self-hosted wordpress is also missing.</p>
<p>Of course everyone is entitled to a little marketing spin now and again, but misrepresenting the facts will get you more than a little lash back from the users who know and love their blogging platforms (as you have now discovered).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennerly</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2009/07/07/comparing-legal-blogging-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-48269</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kennerly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/?p=2526#comment-48269</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m awfully suspicious of that &quot;most widely used&quot; distinction.

WordPress, Blogger, MovableType and TypePad quite obviously host a number of blogs several orders of magnitude over what Avvo does.

If you&#039;re going specifically for legal weblogs, then, well, as I understand it &quot;Avvo Blog&quot; is a whole month old. LexBlog is several years old, with hundreds of clients of which I am aware, including myself.

I highly doubt you had that good a month.

Like many other lawyers, I&#039;ve kept my distance from Avvo since I&#039;m not comfortable with the &quot;rating&quot; system and the erroneous perception of quality it gives clients, and, to be honest, this type of puffery (at best) and misrepresentation (at worst) isn&#039;t helping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m awfully suspicious of that &#8220;most widely used&#8221; distinction.</p>
<p>WordPress, Blogger, MovableType and TypePad quite obviously host a number of blogs several orders of magnitude over what Avvo does.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going specifically for legal weblogs, then, well, as I understand it &#8220;Avvo Blog&#8221; is a whole month old. LexBlog is several years old, with hundreds of clients of which I am aware, including myself.</p>
<p>I highly doubt you had that good a month.</p>
<p>Like many other lawyers, I&#8217;ve kept my distance from Avvo since I&#8217;m not comfortable with the &#8220;rating&#8221; system and the erroneous perception of quality it gives clients, and, to be honest, this type of puffery (at best) and misrepresentation (at worst) isn&#8217;t helping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

