<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Dismisses Browne v. Avvo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/</link>
	<description>Find a Lawyer.  Free Legal Advice.  Lawyer Ratings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: City of Houston</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-282937</link>
		<dc:creator>City of Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-282937</guid>
		<description>Who can you trust? Good ethical lawyers are a dime a dozen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who can you trust? Good ethical lawyers are a dime a dozen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Baum</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-5760</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Baum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-5760</guid>
		<description>Ninety-nine percent of lawyers give the rest of us a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ninety-nine percent of lawyers give the rest of us a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>Thanks for making this site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for making this site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-3738</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3738</guid>
		<description>Well done Mark. So, how will this impact the Other Guy&#039;s Avvo rating?

(JOKE! THIS IS A JOKE!)

Happy Holidays,
Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Mark. So, how will this impact the Other Guy&#8217;s Avvo rating?</p>
<p>(JOKE! THIS IS A JOKE!)</p>
<p>Happy Holidays,<br />
Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence N. Rogak</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-3693</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence N. Rogak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3693</guid>
		<description>This case brings to mind the attorney who sued the date-rating website -- what&#039;s it called? -- dontdatehimgirl.com?  -- for posting ratings from women who called him a lousy date.  By bringing the suit, the idiot got enough publicity to let the entire country know that a lot of women consider him a lousy date.  Suppressing negative opinions about oneself in this information-saturated age just doesn&#039;t work.  Outright slander is one thing, of course, but if mere negative opinions could be suppressed we&#039;d all be in trouble.  Could it be that some attorneys are just such control freaks that they need to silence all critics?  Mmmmmm....  yeah, I think so.  I&#039;ve met &#039;em.  I&#039;ve even dated some of &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case brings to mind the attorney who sued the date-rating website &#8212; what&#8217;s it called? &#8212; dontdatehimgirl.com?  &#8212; for posting ratings from women who called him a lousy date.  By bringing the suit, the idiot got enough publicity to let the entire country know that a lot of women consider him a lousy date.  Suppressing negative opinions about oneself in this information-saturated age just doesn&#8217;t work.  Outright slander is one thing, of course, but if mere negative opinions could be suppressed we&#8217;d all be in trouble.  Could it be that some attorneys are just such control freaks that they need to silence all critics?  Mmmmmm&#8230;.  yeah, I think so.  I&#8217;ve met &#8216;em.  I&#8217;ve even dated some of &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-3692</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3692</guid>
		<description>Congrats to Mark and the Avvo team!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to Mark and the Avvo team!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Mark and team Avvo!  
It&#039;s nice to see the good guys win one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Mark and team Avvo!<br />
It&#8217;s nice to see the good guys win one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Liability Blog</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Liability Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3688</guid>
		<description>Congrats, Mark, to you and your team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats, Mark, to you and your team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/comment-page-1/#comment-3679</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3679</guid>
		<description>[fair disclosure -- Mark and I are friends and former colleagues from Expedia, Inc.]

CONGRATULATIONS, Mark.  

I&#039;ve felt pretty strongly that companies, authors, and yes, even websites ought to be allowed to rate and rank services/products/people... even if those ratings are not precisely as someone else might calculate them.  

Over time, consumers (and the press, and the attorney community) will determine how personally-relevant and accurate the Avvo rating is, and Avvo&#039;s brand will either be elevated or diminished as a result.  But I strongly feel you folks have every right to create and publicize it, and said as much on this board many months ago.  Keep on shining the flashlight in the dark -- the market, and not class-action lawyers, should be the entity that tells you whether you&#039;re on the right track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[fair disclosure -- Mark and I are friends and former colleagues from Expedia, Inc.]</p>
<p>CONGRATULATIONS, Mark.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve felt pretty strongly that companies, authors, and yes, even websites ought to be allowed to rate and rank services/products/people&#8230; even if those ratings are not precisely as someone else might calculate them.  </p>
<p>Over time, consumers (and the press, and the attorney community) will determine how personally-relevant and accurate the Avvo rating is, and Avvo&#8217;s brand will either be elevated or diminished as a result.  But I strongly feel you folks have every right to create and publicize it, and said as much on this board many months ago.  Keep on shining the flashlight in the dark &#8212; the market, and not class-action lawyers, should be the entity that tells you whether you&#8217;re on the right track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

