<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Dismisses Browne v. Avvo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: S. Baum</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-5760</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Baum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-5760</guid>
		<description>Ninety-nine percent of lawyers give the rest of us a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ninety-nine percent of lawyers give the rest of us a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>Thanks for making this site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for making this site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3738</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3738</guid>
		<description>Well done Mark. So, how will this impact the Other Guy's Avvo rating?

(JOKE! THIS IS A JOKE!)

Happy Holidays,
Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Mark. So, how will this impact the Other Guy&#8217;s Avvo rating?</p>
<p>(JOKE! THIS IS A JOKE!)</p>
<p>Happy Holidays,<br />
Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence N. Rogak</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3693</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence N. Rogak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3693</guid>
		<description>This case brings to mind the attorney who sued the date-rating website -- what's it called? -- dontdatehimgirl.com?  -- for posting ratings from women who called him a lousy date.  By bringing the suit, the idiot got enough publicity to let the entire country know that a lot of women consider him a lousy date.  Suppressing negative opinions about oneself in this information-saturated age just doesn't work.  Outright slander is one thing, of course, but if mere negative opinions could be suppressed we'd all be in trouble.  Could it be that some attorneys are just such control freaks that they need to silence all critics?  Mmmmmm....  yeah, I think so.  I've met 'em.  I've even dated some of 'em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case brings to mind the attorney who sued the date-rating website &#8212; what&#8217;s it called? &#8212; dontdatehimgirl.com?  &#8212; for posting ratings from women who called him a lousy date.  By bringing the suit, the idiot got enough publicity to let the entire country know that a lot of women consider him a lousy date.  Suppressing negative opinions about oneself in this information-saturated age just doesn&#8217;t work.  Outright slander is one thing, of course, but if mere negative opinions could be suppressed we&#8217;d all be in trouble.  Could it be that some attorneys are just such control freaks that they need to silence all critics?  Mmmmmm&#8230;.  yeah, I think so.  I&#8217;ve met &#8216;em.  I&#8217;ve even dated some of &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3692</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3692</guid>
		<description>Congrats to Mark and the Avvo team!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to Mark and the Avvo team!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Mark and team Avvo!  
It's nice to see the good guys win one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Mark and team Avvo!<br />
It&#8217;s nice to see the good guys win one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Liability Blog</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Liability Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3688</guid>
		<description>Congrats, Mark, to you and your team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats, Mark, to you and your team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3679</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/12/18/judge-dismisses-browne-v-avvo/#comment-3679</guid>
		<description>[fair disclosure -- Mark and I are friends and former colleagues from Expedia, Inc.]

CONGRATULATIONS, Mark.  

I've felt pretty strongly that companies, authors, and yes, even websites ought to be allowed to rate and rank services/products/people... even if those ratings are not precisely as someone else might calculate them.  

Over time, consumers (and the press, and the attorney community) will determine how personally-relevant and accurate the Avvo rating is, and Avvo's brand will either be elevated or diminished as a result.  But I strongly feel you folks have every right to create and publicize it, and said as much on this board many months ago.  Keep on shining the flashlight in the dark -- the market, and not class-action lawyers, should be the entity that tells you whether you're on the right track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[fair disclosure -- Mark and I are friends and former colleagues from Expedia, Inc.]</p>
<p>CONGRATULATIONS, Mark.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve felt pretty strongly that companies, authors, and yes, even websites ought to be allowed to rate and rank services/products/people&#8230; even if those ratings are not precisely as someone else might calculate them.  </p>
<p>Over time, consumers (and the press, and the attorney community) will determine how personally-relevant and accurate the Avvo rating is, and Avvo&#8217;s brand will either be elevated or diminished as a result.  But I strongly feel you folks have every right to create and publicize it, and said as much on this board many months ago.  Keep on shining the flashlight in the dark &#8212; the market, and not class-action lawyers, should be the entity that tells you whether you&#8217;re on the right track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
