<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visa&#8230;Mastercard&#8230;Discover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avvoblog.com/2007/06/17/visamastercarddiscover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/06/17/visamastercarddiscover/</link>
	<description>Find a Lawyer.  Free Legal Advice.  Lawyer Ratings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:04:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://avvoblog.com/2007/06/17/visamastercarddiscover/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avvoblog.com/2007/06/17/visamastercarddiscover/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note from the developer.. Avvo is using one-way encryption on the card number.  This is also known as irreversible encryption because you can&#039;t (mathematically) get the original credit card number back again.  For example, if your CC number is 4111 1111 1111 1111 and the encrypted form is ABC123, if we ever see &quot;ABC123&quot; again we know that we have seen the card before, but we don&#039;t know what the actual number was.  Make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note from the developer.. Avvo is using one-way encryption on the card number.  This is also known as irreversible encryption because you can&#8217;t (mathematically) get the original credit card number back again.  For example, if your CC number is 4111 1111 1111 1111 and the encrypted form is ABC123, if we ever see &#8220;ABC123&#8243; again we know that we have seen the card before, but we don&#8217;t know what the actual number was.  Make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

